RubiStar

Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

>> To save this document onto your computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser Menu.

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Content

•Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. •Subject knowledge is excellent. •Checklist of required items completed.

•Includes essential knowledge about the topic. •Subject knowledge appears to be good. •Checklist of required items mostly completed.

•Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. •Checklist of required items somewhat completed.

•Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. •Checklist of required items not completed.

Organization / Layout

•Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. • Transitions are completed and medium to fast. • One custom animation was completed

•Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. • Transitions are completed and medium to fast. • One custom animation was completed

•Content is logically organized for the most part. • Missing a transition or animation.

•There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. •No transitions •No animation.

Attractiveness / Originality

•Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. •No annoying sounds or effects.

•Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. •No annoying sounds or effects.

•Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. •No annoying sounds or effects.

•Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. •No annoying sounds or effects.

Text/ Mechanics

•Product shows a large amount of original thought. •Ideas are creative and inventive, without being overwhelming to the audience. •Text is readable and spelling is checked.

•Product shows some original thought. •Work shows new ideas and insights. •Text is readable and spelling is checked.

•Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. •Text is readable and spelling is checked.

•Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. •Text is unreadable and spelling is not checked.

Sources

•Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes in a bibliography. •All documented in desired format.

•Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes in a bibliography. •Most documented in desired format.

•Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. • Little documented in desired format

•Very little or no source information was collected. • None documented in desired format